Artikel: The (partial) intersection between sanctions and AML

In 2024, the European Union introduced a comprehensive anti-money laundering (AML) package aimed at harmonising AML legislation across Member States. This package establishes new obligations for obliged entities (i.e. entities covered by AML legislation) to manage and mitigate the risks associated with anti-money laundering, financing of terrorism and non-compliance with international sanctions. This package marks a significant step towards a unified approach to AML and sanctions compliance within the EU. In this regard, the package represents a partial intersection between AML and sanctions, with the AML framework now serving as a mechanism to monitor adherence to international sanctions. However, the intersection is partial and not without controversy. This article describes the obligations regarding international sanctions incorporated in the new AML package and analyses some of the main problems it raises. This is relevant for entities covered by AML regulations, which will have to adapt their policies and procedures to this new scenario.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Waarom betalen ondernemers losgeld bij ransomware‑aanvallen?

Een actueel en urgent vraagstuk, onderzocht door Sifra M. Matthijsse (Universiteit Leiden & De Haagse Hogeschool / The Hague University of Applied Sciences) binnen het Criminal Justice onderzoeksprogramma, onder begeleiding van Susanne van 't Hoff-de Goede, Jelle Brands en Rutger Leukfeldt. Zij doet onderzoek naar slachtofferschap onder ondernemers, met een focus op beslissingsgedrag, meldingsbereidheid en de rol van cybercriminelen. Aan de hand van interviews, rechtbankdocumenten en grootschalige surveys, analyseerde zij het volledige ‘crime script’ van ransomware: van eerste toegang tot onderhandelingen en betaling.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Artikel: A new era of regulating EU sanctions compliance: a fragmented framework

The EU has introduced explicit compliance obligations in its 14th Russia sanctions package, marking a shift from just prohibiting certain economic activities to also mandating how businesses must ensure compliance. Previously, operators had to adhere to sanctions but were not given clear regulatory requirements on implementation within the regulations. The evolving framework extends beyond sanctions regulations to broader EU legislation, including anti-money laundering (AML), instant payments, and crypto-asset transactions. This fragmented approach risks resulting in overlapping yet incomplete obligations, uncertainty, and administrative complexity. Financial institutions face multiple layers of compliance rules, while other sectors remain underregulated. The article examines these regulatory developments, their scope and their impact on businesses. To improve enforcement and prevent circumvention, a more unified EU compliance framework is necessary. A risk-based, harmonised approach would reduce inconsistencies, enhance clarity for businesses, and ensure sanctions are more effective in practice.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Artikel: A critical analysis of discrimination in screening and monitoring transactions

Both monitoring and sanction screening payment transactions by banks are activities that have a legal basis to carry out. The obligation to monitor transactions for unusualness is laid down in Article 2a of the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Prevention) Act ('Wwft'). According to the Sanctions Act 1977 ('Sw') a supervised institution should adequately check whether the identity of a relationship with a (legal) person or entity to which sanctions apply is consistent.
Both activities are important activities especially as they have a high degree of complexity and the financial, legal and social stakes are high. Millions of transactions are thus mandatorily monitored and screened for possible money laundering, terrorist financing and violation of sanction rules. In these operations, a group of bank clients feel discriminated against.

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^

Proefschrift: Het onderscheid tussen commuun en bijzonder strafrecht

Het proefschrift van Cnossen onderzoekt de wisselwerking tussen het commune en het bijzondere materiële strafrecht in Nederland. De centrale vraag luidt: Is de doorwerking van bijzonder materieel strafrecht op het commune materiële strafrecht legitiem, bezien vanuit het codificatiebeginsel en toegespitst op de beginselen van schuld en legaliteit?

Read More
Print Friendly and PDF ^